hunting boxes. Whether they be well written clues, or the more "cryptic"
ones, the hunt shall prevail for me, not the vote. I can only stand doing
that every four years anyway. This egroups forum used to be a more useful
tool before we had the ability to edit our boxes on the LBNA site itself.
Although I can still see it used as a tool to let people know that there are
indeed new boxes when they do come out. Sort of an advertisement. Back in
2000 we had a bit of a contest going as to who would find the newest boxes
in CT first. Ha ha ha, sometimes they'd be found within hours of the
posting!
~The Ram~
thermometer watching in mid-western CT waiting for snow to ski on
>From: "marthastewartletterboxer"
>Reply-To: letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com
>To: letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [LbNA] Re: Ban banning
>Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 02:52:31 -0000
>
>I like the group vote part, especially if there were choices of
>banning or just moderated status.
>Nisha
>
> >SNIP<
> BUT! I think we should all vote on it. Dreagon
> was put to a vote and after a 62-1 vote to ban him, it was done. Also
>if he comes forward and says he sorry the ban will be lifted. I know
>no one
>wants to ban anyone but no one wants to logon to trash talk. Your in
>the hobby to feel good and find a box in the woods.
>I also do not think a few people should have the power to ban someone
>but the group as a whole should. The group can act as a safe guard.
>It's easy to make a few people mad but it's really hard to make a
>whole group mad. (62-1) It's good bet that the person is/was a jerk
>and the group is better off without hat problem.>SNIP<
>
>
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/